Note: You are currently viewing my old web site. There is a new version with most of this content at OJB.NZ.
The new site is being updated, uses modern techniques, has higher quality media, and has a mobile-friendly version.
This old site will stay on-line for a while, but maybe not indefinitely. Please update your bookmarks. Thanks.


[Index] [Menu] Discussion[Header]
Discussions

(Return to the Original Page)


Discussion for "evolution science religion comments others menu owen"

Comment by Anonymous on 2007-03-26 at 21:15:15:

I think evolution is basically a sound theory also, but it is incomplete in its current form. Science has made inroads, but science is not complete - almost by definition.

Incidentally, have you watched the 'Does God Exist' series by John Clayton? This is an example of a learned Christian and amateur geologist who does believe in evolution . Its rather a good series with much science and geological evidence and arguments and plenty of engaging and entertaining discussion. link.

-

Comment by OJB on 2007-03-26 at 22:17:42:

In what way do you think evolution is incomplete? I think you're right, that science is usually incomplete. No matter how much information we discover, there always seems to be more subtlety and complexity we still need to examine.

I haven't watched the TV series you mention and I don't think I could justify a 4G download. Looking through the table of contents though makes it look fairly routine: irreducible complexity & the anthropic principle, the cause of the cosmos, etc.

-

Comment by Anonymous on 2007-06-25 at 08:10:09:

Most biology books are not correct. A lot of them are not updated and a lot of the experiments that went on years ago, scientists already know they are wrong. Science is starting to prove evolution wrong as it advances. I believe you are stuck in the earlier days before new technologies were created.

-

Comment by OJB on 2007-06-25 at 18:54:35:

Most biology books are not correct. Really? I can't find any major errors in the ones I've looked at. There are a few minor details which have been modified but the basic ideas are as sound as ever. If you have some good examples I'd love to hear them. Science is proving evolution wrong? Well its strange that about 99% of biologists (who are scientists who specialise in biology and evolution) think its not only the best theory, but the only theory we have. Got any stats to prove that science is proving evolution wrong? No, I didn't think so. I'm afraid you're talking total nonsense.

-

Comment by Anonymous on 2007-06-26 at 07:58:46:

Have you ever heard of the huge scientist, Lee Strobel?

-

Comment by OJB on 2007-06-26 at 18:02:39:

I've heard of Lee Strobel, but he's not a scientist - he's a Christian writer. What's your point?

-

You can add a comment to this discussion by clicking the "Discuss" button below.
Or click the "Return" button to return to the original page.

[Comment][Return]

[Contact][Server Blog][AntiMS Apple][Served on Mac]